As flood control projects expand nationwide, public concern has shifted away from speculation and toward a deeper issue: accountability. The controversy persists not because of court rulings or confirmed findings, but because key documents and explanations remain unavailable to the public.
(ads1)
Despite repeated claims circulating online, no verified document has implicated the Duterte family in alleged flood control irregularities. As a result, scrutiny has increasingly focused on the current administration, which now holds authority over budget releases, project approvals, and oversight mechanisms.
The Scale of Flood Control Spending
Flood control programs involve billions of pesos intended to protect communities from disasters. Under the Marcos administration, funding levels increased and implementation accelerated. Supporters cite urgency and infrastructure needs, while critics argue that rapid spending without full transparency raises red flags.
The core issue is not the existence of flood control projects, but the absence of publicly released records detailing how projects were selected, modified, or funded.
When Documents Are Cited but Not Shown
Public trust weakens when alleged files, lists, or internal references are repeatedly mentioned yet never disclosed. In the flood control debate, this pattern has fueled suspicion and speculation.
- Alleged name lists were referenced but never released
- No complete audit trail was made public
- Oversight findings remain largely unseen
In the absence of transparency, silence becomes a liability.
Why the Focus Is on the Marcos Administration
Accountability follows authority. Since flood control budgets and project implementation fall under the current administration, critics argue that responsibility must also be examined at that level.
(ads2)
Some voices have gone further, alleging that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is the “mastermind” behind flood control scams. This claim reflects political criticism and opinion—not a legal verdict. No court or official investigative body has issued such a finding.
Protecting the Innocent, Questioning Power
Defending the Duterte family, supporters argue, is a matter of fairness. Without released documents or court rulings, accusations remain unproven.
Continue Reading the Flood Control Series
- The Name List That Never Came Out
- Why the Duterte Family Was Never Named
- Flood Control Billions and the Silence of Accountability
- Historical Patterns and the Accountability Gap
- Who Controls the Billions?
- Will the Documents Finally Be Released?
At the same time, questioning the Marcos administration is framed as a democratic responsibility. Demanding transparency from those currently in power is not an act of hostility, but a safeguard for public funds and public safety.
The Unresolved Issue
The flood control controversy continues because critical information remains unavailable. Until documents are disclosed, audits completed, and clear explanations provided, allegations will persist.
What the public seeks is not speculation or political theater, but clarity. In matters involving billions in public funds, transparency is not optional—it is essential.
